<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Indian Chartered Accountants in India&#124;Chartered Accountants in Delhi</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in</link> <description>Chartered Accountants Firm in Delh India</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:56:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Knowledge Challenge 04-02-2011</title><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/knowledge-challenge-04-02-2011/</link> <comments>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/knowledge-challenge-04-02-2011/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:56:53 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ashish Ahuja</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Challenge]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/?p=1097</guid> <description><![CDATA[The First Knowledge Challenge Showdown is on 04th Feb, 2012 The Topics for Challenge are:]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/knowledge-challenge-04-02-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Professional Knowledge Challenge</title><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/professional-knowledge-challenge/</link> <comments>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/professional-knowledge-challenge/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:39:41 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ashish Ahuja</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Challenge]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/?p=1086</guid> <description><![CDATA[It is a game where one person challenges all his other colleagues that nobody has better knowledge than him on a particular subject. One week after the challenge, &#8220;The Showdown&#8221; happens where all the other colleagues ask the challenger, questions related to the topic of challenge and then winner is chosen among these based on &#8230;]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/professional-knowledge-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Free Indian Case Law Search Engine www.indiankanoon.org</title><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/free-indian-case-law-search-engine-www-indiankanoon-org/</link> <comments>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/free-indian-case-law-search-engine-www-indiankanoon-org/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:03:46 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ashish Ahuja</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Software]]></category> <category><![CDATA[free income tax case laws]]></category> <category><![CDATA[free indian case laws]]></category> <category><![CDATA[indian case law database]]></category> <category><![CDATA[indian case law search engine]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/?p=1049</guid> <description><![CDATA[Free Indian Case Law Search Engine - www.indiankanoon.org]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/free-indian-case-law-search-engine-www-indiankanoon-org/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Reassessment u/s 147 cannot be initiated if Assessing Officer misinterpreted legal provisions in original assessment</title><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/reassessment-us-147-cannot-be-initiated-if-assessing-officer-misinterpreted-legal-provisions-in-original-assessment/</link> <comments>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/reassessment-us-147-cannot-be-initiated-if-assessing-officer-misinterpreted-legal-provisions-in-original-assessment/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:51:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ashish Ahuja</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[147]]></category> <category><![CDATA[delhi high court 147]]></category> <category><![CDATA[legal misinterpretation not valid reason u/s 147]]></category> <category><![CDATA[reason for reassessment u/s 147]]></category> <category><![CDATA[reassessment u/s 147]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/?p=1046</guid> <description><![CDATA[legal misinterpretation by Assessing Officer in framing original assessment cannot be the basis of initiation of Assessment Proceeding u/s 147]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/reassessment-us-147-cannot-be-initiated-if-assessing-officer-misinterpreted-legal-provisions-in-original-assessment/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Reassessment u/s 147: No addition can be made on other grounds when the reasons for which reassessment undertaken cease to survive</title><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/reassessment-us-147-no-addition-can-be-made-on-other-grounds-when-the-reasons-for-which-reassessment-undertaken-cease-to-survive/</link> <comments>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/reassessment-us-147-no-addition-can-be-made-on-other-grounds-when-the-reasons-for-which-reassessment-undertaken-cease-to-survive/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:02:56 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ashish Ahuja</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[147]]></category> <category><![CDATA[additon on other ground u/s 147]]></category> <category><![CDATA[delhi high court 147]]></category> <category><![CDATA[ranbaxy laboratories delhi high court]]></category> <category><![CDATA[reassessment u/s 147]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/?p=1041</guid> <description><![CDATA[no addition can be made on other grounds, if the Assessing Officer doesn't make any addition on the primary ground on the basis of which proceeding u/s 147 were initiated.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/reassessment-us-147-no-addition-can-be-made-on-other-grounds-when-the-reasons-for-which-reassessment-undertaken-cease-to-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>e-Filed ITR cannot be invalidated if ITR-V not received due to no fault of the assessee</title><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/e-filed-itr-cannot-be-invalidated-if-itr-v-not-received-due-to-no-fault-of-the-assessee/</link> <comments>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/e-filed-itr-cannot-be-invalidated-if-itr-v-not-received-due-to-no-fault-of-the-assessee/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:14:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ashish Ahuja</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[efiling acknowledgement]]></category> <category><![CDATA[itr acknowledgement]]></category> <category><![CDATA[itr v]]></category> <category><![CDATA[itr v not received]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/?p=1033</guid> <description><![CDATA[where ITR-V for e-return was not received by the CPC, Banglore inspite of the same being posted by ordinary post on various dates, then the return cannot be treated as invalid ]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/e-filed-itr-cannot-be-invalidated-if-itr-v-not-received-due-to-no-fault-of-the-assessee/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>MCA extend date of PAN updation in DIN to 29th February, 2012</title><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/mca-extend-date-of-pan-updation-in-din-to-29th-february-2012/</link> <comments>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/mca-extend-date-of-pan-updation-in-din-to-29th-february-2012/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:42:20 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ashish Ahuja</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Companies Act / ROC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[din 4 due date]]></category> <category><![CDATA[din pan updation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[director pan updation]]></category> <category><![CDATA[due date pan updation]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/?p=1025</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ministry of Corporate Affairs has once again extended the date for filing of DIN 4 for updation of PAN in DIN No of directors to 29th February, 2011]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/mca-extend-date-of-pan-updation-in-din-to-29th-february-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Non-Deduction of TDS due to bonafide wrong interpretation of Law is reasonable cause u/s 273B for Non Levy of Penalty u/s 271C</title><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/non-deduction-of-tds-due-to-bonafide-wrong-interpretation-of-law-is-reasonable-cause-us-273b-for-non-levy-of-penalty-us-271c/</link> <comments>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/non-deduction-of-tds-due-to-bonafide-wrong-interpretation-of-law-is-reasonable-cause-us-273b-for-non-levy-of-penalty-us-271c/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:25:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ashish Ahuja</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[failiure to deduct tds]]></category> <category><![CDATA[misinterpretation of law reasonable cause]]></category> <category><![CDATA[penalty for non deducting tds]]></category> <category><![CDATA[penalty u/s 271C]]></category> <category><![CDATA[resonable cause u/s 273B]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/?p=1019</guid> <description><![CDATA[Non-Deduction of TDS due to bonafide wrong interpretation of Law is reasonable cause u/s 273B for Non Levy of Penalty u/s 271C]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/non-deduction-of-tds-due-to-bonafide-wrong-interpretation-of-law-is-reasonable-cause-us-273b-for-non-levy-of-penalty-us-271c/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Trade Advances are not Loans or Advances for deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e)</title><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/trade-advances-are-not-loans-or-advances-for-deemed-dividend-us-222e/</link> <comments>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/trade-advances-are-not-loans-or-advances-for-deemed-dividend-us-222e/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:48:08 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ashish Ahuja</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/?p=1010</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Honorable Delhi High court in its recent judgement held that &#8216;Trade Advances&#8217; between a company and it&#8217;s shareholder (as covered under the definition of section 2(22)(e)) is not in the nature of &#8220;Loans &#38; Advances&#8221; and is therefore not liable to be treated as dividend u/s 2(22)(e). The crux of the judgement is that &#8230;]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/trade-advances-are-not-loans-or-advances-for-deemed-dividend-us-222e/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Onus of Proof on Income Tax Department of additional compenastion received in case of Sale below Market Price</title><link>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/onus-of-proof-on-income-tax-department-that-additional-compenastion-received-in-case-of-sale-below-market-price/</link> <comments>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/onus-of-proof-on-income-tax-department-that-additional-compenastion-received-in-case-of-sale-below-market-price/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:12:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Ashish Ahuja</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category> <category><![CDATA[concealment of income sale below market price]]></category> <category><![CDATA[non-disclosure of income]]></category> <category><![CDATA[sale below market price]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/?p=1004</guid> <description><![CDATA[The onus of proof that income has been concealed in case of sale of property below market price is on the Income Tax Department. The mere fact that the property has been sold at discount / below market price is in itself not sufficient to prove concealment of income unless supported with evidence that consideration received has not been declared.]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.ahujaandahuja.in/onus-of-proof-on-income-tax-department-that-additional-compenastion-received-in-case-of-sale-below-market-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/49 queries in 0.051 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 1195/1325 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.ahujaandahuja.in @ 2012-02-21 07:20:06 -->
